<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cloud-Architecture on ROBOCO</title>
    <link>https://roboco.io/en/tags/cloud-architecture/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Cloud-Architecture on ROBOCO</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 09:00:00 +0900</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://roboco.io/en/tags/cloud-architecture/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>In the Age of Vibe Coding, the Break-Even Point for Multi-Cloud DR Has Dropped</title>
      <link>https://roboco.io/en/posts/vibe-coding-multi-cloud-dr/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 09:00:00 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://roboco.io/en/posts/vibe-coding-multi-cloud-dr/</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The conventional wisdom that multi-cloud is too complex still holds for active-active operations. But for the DR tier, where you keep only backups and the means to recover in another cloud, the cost structure has changed. Vibe coding reduces the cost of building DR in the first place, and the software factory reduces the cost of keeping that DR working and verified over time. Together, these two costs have made up most of what DR costs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
